network profile
|
Feb 3 |
awarded | Informed |
|
Jan 29 |
revised |
How can fewer features be better? It's a quote.. you can't change a quote for grammar issues... |
|
Jan 28 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jan 28 |
revised |
Do Investors Care that We Have Other Businesses? Corrected title |
|
Jan 28 |
suggested | suggested edit on Do Investors Care that We Have Other Businesses? |
|
Jan 27 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jan 27 |
accepted | How can fewer features be better? |
|
Jan 27 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jan 27 |
comment |
How can fewer features be better? @frenchie Ah, now I get it. BTW you should post what you told me here as an answer, it's really helpful and you deserves some rep for it too ;). |
|
Jan 27 |
comment |
How can fewer features be better? @frenchie Oh, I'm starting to get a clearer picture. But why believe in "no features" rather than "simple"? simple programs can have tons of features, but if they keep a simplistic user-interface and not limit essential features for extra features, it sounds much more appealing, don't you think? |
|
Jan 27 |
comment |
How can fewer features be better? @frenchie Ugh you really tackled me. It's so weird. The way I always saw it is the more features - the better, and suddenly it appears to be the other way around. I still don't understand why it is like that. Although for Google.. I don't see anything they can add to the homepage. The links at the top of the page have everything. |
|
Jan 27 |
asked | How can fewer features be better? |
|
Jan 27 |
awarded | Supporter |
