New answers tagged promotion
0
It doesn't matter how you decide, just decide that someone has each specific role, one of which is boss.
Choose by drawing lots if necessary.
You can set up in your bylaws rules about how the board chooses the boss, etc, so the role can change if the person first chosen doesn't work out well in that role. Provide OBJECTIVE evaluation criteria....
0
Your situation sounds similar to ours: we all do a bit of everything. We've been thinking of dividing up the work into clear areas (e.g., marketing, product), but in the meantime we organise ourselves with bug tracking software.
In the bug tracker we list everything outstanding: bugs, new features, marketing effort (time we spend on Twitter, PR...), ...
1
Yes you should appoint a leader/boss and that person should be the one who wants to help develop the rest of you. At the end of the day, it will be the manager's role to get work done through other people.
Some factors which might help influence your decision include:
Is there somebody who is less interested in staying technical as their career develops?
...
4
Ultimately, every organisation needs a boss. Anyone can do the easy stuff, but there also needs to be someone empowered to make the hard, unpopular decisions and then take responsibility for seeing them through.
If you find it impossible to agree on one of you for this role, perhaps look outside for someone to be CEO, or at least someone who can moderate ...
3
This feels like one of those questions which it is impossible to answer without knowing the individuals involved - my first reaction is yes you should have a leader but, in this situation, I don't think it will work.
The reason I say that is you have already acknowledged that you cannot agree under the current arrangement - what exactly would change if ...
0
The answer is both yes and no, with the majority of the time being "no".
First, if you build a desktop website most web developers use "Responsive" themes. These are themes that automatically produce a web AND desktop version from a single source (without needing to produce additional code). This is the most used way to conquer needing to develop for ...
0
Yes, it's necessary.
You might make your site become responsive in order to achieve that.
Why I say necessary? Because When you build a mobile app, do you believe that it can compatible with any kind of smartphones? As you know that nowadays, there are so many kind of handphones or smartphones, but they have each differences. You build your own mobile app, ...
0
It is not necessary to do... but it's a good idea.
I don't have any statistics on this, but I would definitely think making your site responsive would be well worth the effort, particularly if your audience are mobile users.
Coming back to necessary though, there isn't a lot that is necessary (maybe just launching and charging money). Your website isn't a ...
Top 50 recent answers are included
