Tell me more ×
Answers OnStartups is a question and answer site for entrepreneurs looking to start or run a new business. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 1 down vote favorite

I'm copy editing WordPress' Terms of Service to my own web hosting service, and I wonder what does this mean:

If these terms and conditions are considered an offer by Automattic, acceptance is expressly limited to these terms.

(By the way, is it okay to ask such questions here? There might be other parts of WordPress' TOS that I don't understand, and would like to ask about. If this is the wrong place, perhaps you know somewhere else where I could ask?)

Google hasn't been helpful — instead I find 100 000 other copies of WordPress' TOS.

share|improve this question
Perhaps it'd be interesting to know, that I live in Sweden (in northern Europe), not in the US. – KajMagnus Aug 15 '12 at 4:13

3 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted 
<IANAL>

It is referring to the formation of a Contract, which generally requires five things including Offer and Acceptance. I assume they don't want to be bound in Contract, except under circumstances that they stipulate.

</IANAL>
share|improve this answer
Okay, I hope I understand now. Actually, at first, I didn't know what a contract is. But this Wikipedia section: Offer_and_acceptance, and this: Intention_to_be_legally_bound, were useful. – KajMagnus Aug 14 '12 at 9:25
Anyway, the phrase is good for me, so I'll include it in my terms, even if I might not understand it or its implications to 100%. – KajMagnus Aug 14 '12 at 9:27
up vote 3 down vote

Please please please don't just bulk copy (and presumably) edit somebody else's TOS and apply it to your own company. You've already demonstrated that you don't understand at least one very important clause, and there's a good chance that you don't understand other clauses (even if you think you do) - the result of this could be disastrous.

Get a lawyer to do this, or better yet, write a plain language TOS instead of something full lof pseudo legal mumbo jumbo which does nothing to actually help the provider or the user, except win by obfuscation/obscurity.

You could also check out services such as SnapTerms.com to make this easier.

share|improve this answer
Thanks, that's good advice — as of right now. However, there are 3 things I haven't told you: 1) I have 0 users, and I don't know if anyone will ever use the serice I'm building. So it feels a bit early to spend money on lawyers right now — it's more like a hobby project right now. And, 2) initially, I'm not going to charge people any money for using the service, which makes me feel a bit safer. And 3) I live in Sweden, not in the US, and the Swedish justice systems seems ... more just :-) than the one in the US with software patents and weird stuff. – KajMagnus Aug 15 '12 at 4:03
If the service does take off, then yes, I'll consult with a laywer. SnapTerms.com seems interesting — but I live in Sweden; I suppose it might be preferable that I consult with Swedish lawyers. – KajMagnus Aug 15 '12 at 4:06
(Concerning plain language TOS — are there any companies that actually use "home made" simple (and short?) plain language TOS? As far as I've read, sometimes people recommend against not using weird legal mumbo-jumbo, and say that "normal language" has virtually no effect in courts) – KajMagnus Aug 15 '12 at 4:12
up vote 0 down vote

It's actually a hard question, even for someone with a legal background like myself. Offer and acceptance follow the "mirror rule" as the wikipedia page you've found reports, so it's not like you can send an email to Wordpress and add stuff. That language seems to imply the possibility of an exception to this rule, although the only exception I know regards physical goods (http://www.utsa.edu/purchasing/contracts/definition.cfm) so it doesn't make sense for a service provider like Wordpress. I might be missing some recent case law that made the counsels of Automattic worry about this possibility.

Another peculiar part of the Wordpress ToS is that conditional at the beginning: nowadays terms of service are considered contractually binding most of the times.

Feel free to post this question and any other question you might have on that document on Docracy as maybe there are some Internet-Law focused attorneys who have a better idea.

share|improve this answer
Concerning the conditional at the beginning (i.e. "If these terms and conditions are considered an offer"): On the page you linked, utsa.edu/purchasing/contracts/definition.cfm, I read that "Both parties must give something of value and receive something of value. If only one party receives value from an arrangement, the arrangement is generally defined as a gift rather than an enforceable contract." ... – KajMagnus Aug 15 '12 at 5:31
... but WordPress.com does offer free blog hosting (well, they do show some adds, sometimes). Perhaps the ToS would in some cases not be considered a contract, if a blogger pays Automattic nothing, and Automattic has shown no adds – KajMagnus Aug 15 '12 at 5:35
yes, good point, it might be that... Still, it's pretty bad language. Why would you put a conditional in something that covers 99% of your use cases? It just adds confusion. – Veronica Aug 16 '12 at 19:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.