Tell me more ×
Answers OnStartups is a question and answer site for entrepreneurs looking to start or run a new business. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose a startup has 5 founders with the next contributions...

1: X hours of work in the startup.
2: A patent (the design of a product never produced).
3: $50K of funding.
4: Marketing skills.
5: Direct Sales skills.

How we calculate equity based on the contributions difficult to convert to money? What is a typical strategy to deal with this issue?

share|improve this question

1 Answer

20% each.

If it works, 20% of something of value is nice to own. If it doesn't work, 20% of nothing is... well you get the picture.

In general, unless there is a compelling reason and complete agreement between all parties, it makes sense to go for an equal split. Of course, IMHO, YMMV, IANAL, etc.

share|improve this answer
Your answers is the assumption of a final equity result perfectly equilibrated (not real), which is the origin of the question: How to calculate (or determine, measure, evaluate, have a better approximation of) the real value of contributions? – Nestor Sanchez A Jul 7 '12 at 23:41
Okay, so what is your compelling reason for a non-equal split? There must be one, or you wouldn't have asked the question. – Steve Jones Jul 9 '12 at 17:48
The reason is that work time (controlled) and money are directly measurable. But the others not. – Nestor Sanchez A Jul 9 '12 at 19:16
That isn't strictly true and even if it was it isn't sufficient justification to deviate from the equal split, IMHO. For example, Partner A may work 1000 hours and not really get anywhere, while Partner B may make a couple of phone calls that help the business double revenue overnight. Who made the best contribution? – Steve Jones Jul 10 '12 at 9:11

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.