Tell me more ×
Answers OnStartups is a question and answer site for entrepreneurs looking to start or run a new business. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 1 down vote favorite
1

I know that the first thing investors look for is a good strong team. Until recently, I thought that just meant the founder and co-founders. However, I was just checking out angelist, and most of the start ups list the founders, advisors, employees, references, and something called a "referrer" (which I assume is probably an angelist thing). I may have answered my own question on this, but Id really like to hear input from everyone. So my question is this;

If you were building a team, with the the future intentions of looking for funding, what would your "dream team" look like? Not naming people, but positions...like One coder, one design guy, three advisors experienced in, etc...

Thanks for your input!

share|improve this question
2  
Wouldn't it depend on what the team is supposed to do? – Joel Spolsky♦ Jun 27 '12 at 0:03
1  
Everybody full-time, all in. – frenchie Jun 27 '12 at 0:24
Lets just say that your building the next great social network. From an investors point of view, do they look at who your advisors are? Or who your employees are? References? Or is it just the founders they are looking at? When they look at a "team"...what would there definition of a "team" actually be? I guess that would be the better question. – Derek Jun 27 '12 at 19:37
When investors looking for dream team, they want to know if you are all competent at your jobs. If you have management position and you are telling about your great ideas, this is not what they are looking for. – Andrew Smith Jun 28 '12 at 16:25

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Opinions vary. Here are a few:

http://gust.com/angel-investing/startup-blogs/2012/04/10/5-traits-investors-look-for-in-entrepreneurs/

http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2010/10/06/the-four-main-things-that-investors-look-for-in-a-startup/

http://blog.startupprofessionals.com/2011/06/investors-look-for-these-six.html

http://www.geekwire.com/2012/bill-bryant-time-startup/

http://www.podiumventures.com/blog/72-5-things-investors-look-for-in-a-startup

http://thedrawingboard.me/2011/09/12/how-does-an-investor-evaluate-a-startups-team/

Many boil down to Team competency (technical+market experience) , Addressable Market (size + verified customer research + traction are pluses), commitment to team & market (be it personal invested time or money - different views abound) .

My 2 cents: How well you know your target market post launch and how you are addressing it seems important of late - it's not just about how quickly you can assemble and launch, its how quickly can you validate your assumptions and adjust to feedback. A slide deck which that information goes a lot further than why you think your market and people is/are awesome!

share|improve this answer
@Jimg...thank you very much for the articles. I read them all. Each one gave me a little more info. Another question for you...when an investor is looking at a team he is considering investing in, is he looking at only the founders? Or is he also looking at who their advisors are, who their employees are, and references? Thanks again, I really appreciate the time you dedicate to answer questions like mine...as dumb as they may be! lol – Derek Jun 27 '12 at 19:47
Hi Derek - only my opinions - YRMV. (are they) looking only at founders? A fundable CEO is extremely important, as is the management team. Domain knowledge - also important. Advisors - depends on the market / company. Pharma matters more than, say, a social iphone app. Market and the mgmt teams documented customer experience proves domain understanding and team skills. See steveblank.com/2009/11/12/… as an example. – jimg Jun 28 '12 at 4:02
THAT'S the answer I've been waiting for. Thank you very much. – Derek Jun 28 '12 at 4:48
With taking feedback it's actually a very good one. There is nothing like "fail-start-up" with team who refuses to change password "password" over 4 years arguing that other companies does the same :-) - Happened for real, and not only with this, there is nearly 2.000 technical issues I was not able to change. – Andrew Smith Jun 28 '12 at 22:26
up vote 0 down vote

Common sense answer, as I know little to nothing about VC...

Are you building a team just to attract investors? Shouldn't you be building a team the way in which it is best for your particular business?

Wouldn't smart investors recognize that?

share|improve this answer
Yes and no? Some investors require a business plan, some don't. My goal is to build a strong team of course, but sometimes investors look at things that maybe I wouldn't have thought of. That's why I posted the question. For the most part I'm just looking forward and trying to arm myself with as much information as possible. Until looking at Angelist, I wouldn't have thought about advisors, etc as really being part of my team to present to an investor. – Derek Jun 27 '12 at 20:44
Advisors are different, you were asking about fulltime employees as well (at the end of your question). That is what my answer is directed at. – EkoostikMartin Jun 27 '12 at 21:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.