Tell me more ×
Answers OnStartups is a question and answer site for entrepreneurs looking to start or run a new business. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How important is it to have the original of a contract? Would having just a copy of a signed contract still make it enforceable? Is it any different than signing two copies of the same contract?

Is it suspicious that the other party kept the signed contract and gives you a photocopied version?

share|improve this question

3 Answers

I am not a lawyer, but what I learned in college was that the "most original" copy of a given document wins in court. In other words, if one party shows up with an original, and the other shows up with a third-generation Xerox copy, and they differ, the original will prevail. That's why lawyers try to keep the most original copy possible.

Kekito's advice is what most people do. For less important contracts, emailing signed, scanned PDFs should be fine. For more crucial things, I would start with the signed, scanned PDF and then follow up with a signed original via snail-mail.

share|improve this answer
Just to add a note about signed PDFs -- it's important to make sure the certificate you use is approved for use in court because there are different grades of the encryption key, and the courts usually require certificates with independent verification (rather than a self-generated key) – theonlylos Aug 2 '11 at 2:01
Joel, there is not a rule that the "most original" copy of a document wins. It would be just one factor to consider. – user6603 Aug 2 '11 at 12:42

In my company, we don't keep originals of most contracts. They get scanned and saved on our computers. It is too much hassle to worry about filing paper contracts, and too much hassle to use snail mail to send originals back and forth.

If the contract is not super important (e.g., a typical sales contract or NDA) then don't worry about it. A copy of a signed contract can be used to enforce the contract in court.

For really important contracts -- say the acquisition of a company -- lawyers will sometimes go to the extra trouble to have multiple copies and people signing sign each of the multiple copies and snail mailing them back and forth. This might give some slight extra protection against forgeries, but anyone really wanting to forge a contract is not going to be limited by this.

If it would make you feel at ease, ask the other party to print out another copy, sign it, and send it to you.

share|improve this answer

I'm not a lawyer so I could be wrong, but I believe that when it comes to contracts, a copy is legal as long as it does not say in the writing that an original is required. For example, with estate law one of the top things I hear from my contacts in that field is that copies of Wills are always void in court, even if the original is destroyed or cannot be found.

In general business law, every agreement I've used with clients was valid as a copy.

In addition to paper copies however, you might want to explore getting a digital signature through Adobe or one of their vendors. I've been using digital signatures for virtually all my sensitive/critical business correspondence because a digital signature keeps modifications from being made to the original document down the road, and also it protects you from having a client reword a paper contract, and then attaching the signature page (which is where you can have serious issues if a dispute arises).

The only thing about electronic signatures is that they are a bit costly (usually I've seen them around at least $400/yearly) and you have to own a copy of Acrobat Professional. Also, not every signature is approved for court use so it is best to ask an attorney which vendors to buy a certificate from.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.