Tell me more ×
Answers OnStartups is a question and answer site for entrepreneurs looking to start or run a new business. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm just curious about how a contract between two parties in different countries would handle breaches/consequences of said contract.

Let's say between two parties in USA and Asia. If the contract says that it will be governed by Asia law, and in the event of a breach, there is consequence/penalty of $x for each violation occurrence.

If there was a breach by the party in USA, how exactly would that contract be enforced by the party in Asia? Considering:

  • Do laws of one country apply to parties in another?
  • Not every culture honors written contract and prefer verbal contracts
share|improve this question
1  
+1: Excellent question. It's a very bad idea to assume other countries handle contracts and breaches the way yours does, or that a judgment in one country can be enforced in another. For instance, a lot of US companies have gotten burned doing business in Korea because their approach to contracts is fundamentally different. – Bob Murphy Jul 22 '11 at 15:40

3 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

First: IANAL

Typically the aggrieved party has to file a lawsuit in the jurisdiction where the contract is governed, win the case and then collect the damages.

To collect the damages you have to locate any assets, then get a judge in that jurisdiction to award you the assets.

share|improve this answer
So the party in Asia would have to file a lawsuit in Asia, win, then also get a judge in the USA to award the assets? – DustinDavis Jul 21 '11 at 19:36
1  
That's how a lawyer explained it to me. The point he was making was how difficult it was to really, truly, enforce your contracts – james Jul 21 '11 at 23:33

Enforcing a contract where the parties to the contract are from different countries is very difficult. The reason is that even if you win from a legal perspective, you still need to collect damages, and in order to collect damages you probably need to file suit in the country of the other party.

In the U.S., at least, there is a strong principle of freedom of contract. If the contract states that the laws of Timbuktu control the contract, then generally U.S. courts will apply the laws of Timbuktu in addressing any breach of contract issues.

One problem you may run into, however, is that you can only sue a person in a U.S. court if that court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant. If the defendant is in Timbuktu and does very little in the U.S., then U.S. courts will probably determine that they do not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant and dismiss the suit.

Even if you get over that hurdle, and you win the lawsuit and the court says that the defendant owes you $1 million, you have to be able to collect that money from the defendant. If the defendant does not have any assets in the U.S., then the only way to collect money would be to sue the defendant in a country where the defendant has assets, and that country may not honor the judgment of the U.S. court.

In summary, if you have a contract with a party in Timbuktu and that party breaches the contract, you should just write it off and move on because the likelihood of collecting any damages is minimal.

share|improve this answer
Thanks. I was actually refering to the US party breaching the contract. how would the person from Timbuktu collect damages. But based on your "principal of freedom" statement, it seems like the Timbuktu party could sue the US party in the US and win. – DustinDavis Jul 22 '11 at 14:55

The "International Private Law" contains rules on what happens if there is a conflict between members of two different countries. Check out the Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_laws

You need to take into account the justice system and the associated costs of suing in the other country. When we were in the situation that we needed to sue someone from the U.S. we were surprised how expensive this is in the U.S. compared to Western Europe. If you need to be present in court, the price is even higher, you need to pay for flights to the U.S., hotels etc.

If your chances of winning the dispute are good, you can find a lawyer, who sues on your behalf on a contingency basis. This is often a better option than dropping the law suit. We have done this successfully.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.