Tell me more ×
Answers OnStartups is a question and answer site for entrepreneurs looking to start or run a new business. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 2 down vote favorite

My technical advisors...the guys that want to write code for me...want to drop about 80K on hardware assets. Ouch! Of course a lease comes to mind. Less ouch! Yet, I am aware of the cloud which is like getting the functionality of servers but paying for it as if it is a utility. Pay for what I use - a pure variable cost. Great! :-) Now could somebody explain to me why I would want to do anything else but the cloud? I mean, I can see why I need workstation/laptops, but can't I get all my other server needs hosted website, database, cache, apps, backups, DNS, Crypto, and mail - and just pay as I go?

Thank you for your advice.

Malcolm C.

share|improve this question

3 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Maybe if you use a hosted solution they won't let you burn incense around the servers to improve their Chi? 80K = Get a second opinion unless they want to put up half (and take a picture of the expression on their faces when you ask).

Programmers love control and don't want to have to tell you "We can't do that." because of something out of their control. Having 80K worth of hardware at your disposal lets you do just about anything. Have them look into plan B. Maybe you need to find someone who has developed in the cloud?

share|improve this answer
lol. Take a picture. I do want them to look into plan B, and if they can't I'll need to look for another team - one with some insight into the cloud. – mudduckk Apr 28 '10 at 16:02
+1 on second opinion. On the surface this sound wrong; if others disagree, fine. – Jason Apr 29 '10 at 1:26
@Jason - taking a little levity on the first part, but if they are too eager to spend someone else's money at the beginning, what are the billable hours going to look like? – JeffO Apr 29 '10 at 20:48
up vote 2 down vote

Do you know already what the capacity you will need to run your business in terms of broadband and storage? If you are moving from one option to another and already have real data then it is one thing. However, if your advisors base their estimates on some case of scenario, then it is a totally different thing.

80K sounds like a major hardware purchase. Why not try to lease with a provider that can scale your capacity based on your real needs? Run it like this for a few months and see what exactly do you need.

share|improve this answer
Good stuff thanks. Don't know my capacity. I know the business model, the strategy to execute. I know little to nil about computer science. – mudduckk Apr 28 '10 at 15:58
Then you ought to lease a scalable solution. It'll only cost you what you need plus it'll give you a chance to learn about your business needs. Leasing hardware today is a lot cheaper then it was in the 90th, when people actually bought their own. – usabilitest Apr 28 '10 at 20:47
up vote 3 down vote

and welcome to this site.

I'm sorry, but as a guy who knows a thing or two about the cloud, I don't really see any way to answer your question with the information given.

Cloud hosting has some tradeoffs, there are limits on disk I/O, SQL DB server size, network latency and other things that make it less than ideal for some use cases. You didn't say what your product requires / is; so there is no way for us to advice.

However, for 90+ percent of common web applications (where latency is not a major issue) cloud hosting can be a good fit.

Another thing: It's just a gut feeling, and I wasn't there ... but as you present it, that advisor is giving me .. bad vibes. If a tech walked up to me, and suggested dropping 80,000 USD on hardware purchase for a startup without some very good reasons ... I'd question his competence.

all my other server needs hosted website, database, cache, apps, backups, DNS, Crypto,

Website, probably. Database, probably. Cache, yes. Apps, well what do you mean by "apps"? Backups, yes. DNS, yes. Crypto, well what do you mean by "crypto".

In case it's not evident, many of the services above you'd want to buy as hosted solutions from specialized providers, not roll your own on a generic cloud computing platform.

share|improve this answer
Good job even though you didn't know how to answer. Trust your gut. Question the competence. Thanks. – mudduckk Apr 28 '10 at 16:00
@mudduckk -- I think you missed the point of this answer, which is the best answer here. Jesper does know how to answer, and furthermore knows that asking whether "apps" should be in the cloud isn't a sensible answer. That's like asking whether you should use pen and paper for "art." Depends on the art! Generally cloud is better but there are applications where it's the wrong tool. – Jason Apr 29 '10 at 1:27
@jason -- Jesper said, "I don't really see any way to answer your question", yet he went on to do a good job answering my question. His is the right answer to the cloud vs lease problem. Jeff O's answer is the correct answer to my people problem, and it is the people who will execute the work. This is a hard side/soft side of business distinction. Jesper may well have an opportunity to win the populist badge on this one and I would tip my hat to him if he did. – mudduckk Apr 29 '10 at 14:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.